logo
Call us: +44 (0)1865 244727

  • Home
  • Scope
  • News
  • Products
    • RADAR
    • CALL-OFF PROJECTS
  • Clients
  • Contact
  • How we work
    • Independent
      • Common law orthodoxies
      • Sensationalism
      • Expert witness
      • Regulation and Politics
      • Tied services
    • Up-to-date
      • Timely
      • Insurance Scenarios
      • Probabilistic Methods
    • Expert
      • Personal Injury
      • Trends
    • Innovative
  • Database
    • Member’s login
    • Member’s Settings
    • Register
    • RADAR Database
  • Recent projects
    • EMFs
    • STRESS AT WORK
    • WHIPLASH
    • WELDING RODS: MANGANESE EXPOSURE
    • ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
    • Other Projects



2011. The ageing demographic – effect on vulnerability to hazards at work.

Jul 05, 2012
by Andrew@Reliabilityoxford.co.uk
2 Comments
The authors find little evidence of injury or productivity problems associated with employing older workers. Even if age by itself is not predictive of injury or productivity problems, vulnerabilities do in fact increase with age. It is debatable whether a higher standard of care should automatically be considered at age above 50, but failure to look for known, very common, vulnerabilities at any age could be regarded as negligent.

Evidence from:

HSE RR832 (2011)
An update of the literature on age and employment

According to the report, Age by itself is not a valid trigger for a higher standard of the duty of preventive care; breach of duty would be established by the normal standards.

11#1 18

2 Comments
  1. suadeo nobis May 29, 2012 at 2:27 pm Reply
    Given the political urge to increase work participation in the over 65's the pressure to introduce greater protection from factors which could aggravate ill-health will continue to grow. Never mind that outright causation is not much affected by age...if work is too difficult the work will be changed.
  2. Andrew@Reliability May 29, 2012 at 2:44 pm Reply
    The ageing demographic should provide a very slow change to liability exposure-manageable by experience rating in the time-honoured way. This comfortable view could be threatened by sudden changes in duty of care standards - if they had a retrospective effect or if they tapped into IBNR for example. It would be as well for insurance representatives to engage with HSE and DWP on this issue.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

captcha *

Search Documents


Categories

  • Causation
    • de minimis
    • material contribution
  • Date of knowledge
  • Diagnosis
  • Duty of Care
  • Exposure estimation data
  • Mitigation
  • Motor related injury
  • News
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • November 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • November 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • November 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012

© Re: Liability (Oxford) Ltd. 2012. All rights reserved.
Website Design by The Big Picture