Evidence from: McMunn v. BABCOCK & WILCOX POWER GENERATION GROUP, INC – ordered on the 27th Feb 2014 The claim was that radiation leaks had caused cancer in the community. There was evidence that the plant in question had emitted 3 kg of highly enriched uranium. If so, permissible lung doses would probably have been exceeded by a considerable margin in some members of the community. Daubert was appealed to on the subject of admissibility of expert testimony. It was concluded that so long as a justifiable method had been adopted then expert evidence is admissible. Alleged flaws in the methodology go to the weight of the expert’s opinion, not its admissibility. “There is a difference between what is unreliable support and what a trier of fact may conclude is insufficient support for an expert’s conclusion.Moreover, because reasonable scientific minds can differ on the methodologies discussed, the motion to exclude the opinion of [expert X] will be denied. R