logo
Call us: +44 (0)1865 244727

  • Home
  • Scope
  • News
  • Products
    • RADAR
    • CALL-OFF PROJECTS
  • Clients
  • Contact
  • How we work
    • Independent
      • Common law orthodoxies
      • Sensationalism
      • Expert witness
      • Regulation and Politics
      • Tied services
    • Up-to-date
      • Timely
      • Insurance Scenarios
      • Probabilistic Methods
    • Expert
      • Personal Injury
      • Trends
    • Innovative
  • Database
    • Member’s login
    • Member’s Settings
    • Register
    • RADAR Database
  • Recent projects
    • EMFs
    • STRESS AT WORK
    • WHIPLASH
    • WELDING RODS: MANGANESE EXPOSURE
    • ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
    • Other Projects



2001. Epidemiology for insurers. Bias.

May 22, 2012
by Andrew@Reliabilityoxford.co.uk
0 Comment
Evidence from:

Andrew@reliabilityoxford.co.uk

Bias is a term that is commonly referred to in epidemiological studies. It is a technical term and does not imply a partisan desire for or attempt to produce a particular outcome.

Bias is simply any factor that can distort the outcome of epidemiological work from its true value. There are a number of types of bias to consider:
• failure to record or identify factors (confounders) that could result in the same effect or prevent the effect of the causal hypothesis under study.
• inappropriate selection of study population.
• diagnostic and exposure measurement techniques can be under or over sensitive, under or over specific and plain wrong.
• measurements may be systematically biased. For example, an observer may improve in the accuracy of his observations with practice. If more cases than controls are observed at
the beginning of the study, the results could be biased.

Bias is particularly likely in studies that rely on exposure memory and/or self reported symptoms for diagnosis.

In some cases the inevitable random errors in study data have the effect of biasing the outcome away from the true measure of association of exposure and disease. Random error in dichotomous measures (i.e. Some or no exposure or, some or no disease) should bias the result toward the null (RR=1). More complex exposure and outcome measures have unpredictable dependencies on random error.

Statistical methods can be applied to check the sensitivity of the reported outcome to random error in model variables.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

captcha *

Search Documents


Categories

  • Causation
    • de minimis
    • material contribution
  • Date of knowledge
  • Diagnosis
  • Duty of Care
  • Exposure estimation data
  • Mitigation
  • Motor related injury
  • News
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • November 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • November 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • November 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012

© Re: Liability (Oxford) Ltd. 2012. All rights reserved.
Website Design by The Big Picture