logo
Call us: +44 (0)1865 244727

  • Home
  • Scope
  • News
  • Products
    • RADAR
    • CALL-OFF PROJECTS
  • Clients
  • Contact
  • How we work
    • Independent
      • Common law orthodoxies
      • Sensationalism
      • Expert witness
      • Regulation and Politics
      • Tied services
    • Up-to-date
      • Timely
      • Insurance Scenarios
      • Probabilistic Methods
    • Expert
      • Personal Injury
      • Trends
    • Innovative
  • Database
    • Member’s login
    • Member’s Settings
    • Register
    • RADAR Database
  • Recent projects
    • EMFs
    • STRESS AT WORK
    • WHIPLASH
    • WELDING RODS: MANGANESE EXPOSURE
    • ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
    • Other Projects



2001. Latex allergy testing.

May 23, 2012
by Andrew@Reliabilityoxford.co.uk
0 Comment
Evidence from:

K Turjanmaa. Allergy. September (2001) Vol. 56 # 9 p 810.

An editorial on the subject of latex allergy.

Allergy to natural rubber latex (NRL) has been known for over 20 years.

While there remains no universal consensus on how to diagnose latex allergy- guidelines have been issued by the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Allergy (1993) Vol. 48 supplement 14:57-62.

Skin prick tests are believed by the author to be the most reliable, but allergen assays are non-standard. That is, the materials applied to the skin to test for allergy differ in allergen composition and concentration.

EAACI are working on a revised guideline, now is the time to influence it.

Comment
Insurers may wish to consider becoming involved in the development of a standard for diagnosis. A widely accepted standard would reduce uncertainty.

In fact latex contains a number of allergens, some of which are shared by a wide range of plants and other organisms. A diagnosis of latex allergy would have to account for this lack of specificity.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

captcha *

Search Documents


Categories

  • Causation
    • de minimis
    • material contribution
  • Date of knowledge
  • Diagnosis
  • Duty of Care
  • Exposure estimation data
  • Mitigation
  • Motor related injury
  • News
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • November 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • November 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • November 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012

© Re: Liability (Oxford) Ltd. 2012. All rights reserved.
Website Design by The Big Picture