logo
Call us: +44 (0)1865 244727

  • Home
  • Scope
  • News
  • Products
    • RADAR
    • CALL-OFF PROJECTS
  • Clients
  • Contact
  • How we work
    • Independent
      • Common law orthodoxies
      • Sensationalism
      • Expert witness
      • Regulation and Politics
      • Tied services
    • Up-to-date
      • Timely
      • Insurance Scenarios
      • Probabilistic Methods
    • Expert
      • Personal Injury
      • Trends
    • Innovative
  • Database
    • Member’s login
    • Member’s Settings
    • Register
    • RADAR Database
  • Recent projects
    • EMFs
    • STRESS AT WORK
    • WHIPLASH
    • WELDING RODS: MANGANESE EXPOSURE
    • ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
    • Other Projects



ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE

Compounded by evolution in the civil law:

Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is widely regarded as a risk factor for lung cancer and for cardiovascular disease. The position was clearly suggested in the mid 1970s, credibly asserted in the late 1980s and officially acknowledged in the late 1990s/ early 2000s. Guidance on the elimination of smoking at work has been available since the late 1980s. Smoking in indoor public places has now been banned in the UK.

At all times, the proposed association was very weak; not sufficient by itself to establish causation in an individual case. However, the degree to which risk is cumulative varies by health outcome e.g. heart disease, and, at common law, the degree of risk that is accepted as being material to an outcome has changed over the past 30 years. The emergence of modern views of material contribution may not have been predictable at the time that an exposure was relevant. Bailey v MOD sets out the current thinking on material contribution; when and how it replaces the ‘but for’ test.

We have developed an objective test of de minimis which could help the courts to assess whether any marginal exposure made a material contribution to disease.

Other projects

Compounded by evolution in the civil law:

Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is widely regarded as a risk factor for lung cancer and for cardiovascular disease. The position was clearly suggested in the mid 1970s, credibly asserted in the late 1980s and officially acknowledged in the late 1990s/ early 2000s. Guidance on the elimination of smoking at work has been available since the late 1980s. Smoking in indoor public places has now been banned in the UK.

At all times, the proposed association was very weak; not sufficient by itself to establish causation in an individual case. However, the degree to which risk is cumulative varies by health outcome e.g. heart disease, and, at common law, the degree of risk that is accepted as being material to an outcome has changed over the past 30 years. The emergence of modern views of material contribution may not have been predictable at the time that an exposure was relevant. Bailey v MOD sets out the current thinking on material contribution; when and how it replaces the ‘but for’ test.

We have developed an objective test of de minimis which could help the courts to assess whether any marginal exposure made a material contribution to disease.

Other projects

Search Documents


Categories

  • Causation
    • de minimis
    • material contribution
  • Date of knowledge
  • Diagnosis
  • Duty of Care
  • Exposure estimation data
  • Mitigation
  • Motor related injury
  • News
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • November 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • November 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • November 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012

© Re: Liability (Oxford) Ltd. 2012. All rights reserved.
Website Design by The Big Picture