logo
Call us: +44 (0)1865 244727

  • Home
  • Scope
  • News
  • Products
    • RADAR
    • CALL-OFF PROJECTS
  • Clients
  • Contact
  • How we work
    • Independent
      • Common law orthodoxies
      • Sensationalism
      • Expert witness
      • Regulation and Politics
      • Tied services
    • Up-to-date
      • Timely
      • Insurance Scenarios
      • Probabilistic Methods
    • Expert
      • Personal Injury
      • Trends
    • Innovative
  • Database
    • Member’s login
    • Member’s Settings
    • Register
    • RADAR Database
  • Recent projects
    • EMFs
    • STRESS AT WORK
    • WHIPLASH
    • WELDING RODS: MANGANESE EXPOSURE
    • ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
    • Other Projects



2001. Back pain prognosis.

May 22, 2012
by Andrew@Reliabilityoxford.co.uk
0 Comment
Pain hypersensitivity could explain disability where tissue damage is absent. This preliminary study provides tentative clues about this phenomenon and its potential prognostic power.

MWerneke et al. Spine. April (2001) Vol. 26 #7 p 758

A proposed new method for predicting chronicity of low back pain following an acute attack.

The authors propose that centralisation of pain within weeks of the acute attack may indicate a better outcome.

Centralisation phenomenon is where the pain migrates from the distal or peripheral to the proximal or central.

The authors conclude that the negative assessment of centralisation in the first few weeks is a useful predictor of continuing (long-term) pain and disability. However, the study was either not well designed or poorly reported.

Comment
A semi objective test would be very useful in selecting back pain cases that ought to be managed more closely. The method proposed here is not validated by this study, but it is likely (given the desire to find a physical explanation for disability) to be included in more comprehensive assessment of prognostic indicators.

A method for assessing centralisation needs to be fully validated before the proposal can be tested further. In our view it is too early to rely on centralisation phenomenon for clinical decisions.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

captcha *

Search Documents


Categories

  • Causation
    • de minimis
    • material contribution
  • Date of knowledge
  • Diagnosis
  • Duty of Care
  • Exposure estimation data
  • Mitigation
  • Motor related injury
  • News
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • November 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • November 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • November 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012

© Re: Liability (Oxford) Ltd. 2012. All rights reserved.
Website Design by The Big Picture