logo
Call us: +44 (0)1865 244727

  • Home
  • Scope
  • News
  • Products
    • RADAR
    • CALL-OFF PROJECTS
  • Clients
  • Contact
  • How we work
    • Independent
      • Common law orthodoxies
      • Sensationalism
      • Expert witness
      • Regulation and Politics
      • Tied services
    • Up-to-date
      • Timely
      • Insurance Scenarios
      • Probabilistic Methods
    • Expert
      • Personal Injury
      • Trends
    • Innovative
  • Database
    • Member’s login
    • Member’s Settings
    • Register
    • RADAR Database
  • Recent projects
    • EMFs
    • STRESS AT WORK
    • WHIPLASH
    • WELDING RODS: MANGANESE EXPOSURE
    • ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
    • Other Projects



2001. vCJD cluster in Queeniborough.

May 22, 2012
by Andrew@Reliabilityoxford.co.uk
0 Comment
This editorial suggests a strong case for a specific identifiable cause of vCJD in Queeniborough.

Evidence from:

H Ashraf. Lancet March (2001) Vol. 357 #9620 p. 937.

Five cases of confirmed new-variant CJD have occurred in a geographically small area in Leicestershire. The cases were included in a case control study which established a relative risk of 15 if you purchased and consumed beef from at least one of two butchers who, as standard practice, removed cow brains. Statistical significance was not recorded.

Comment
Clustering of cases will occur by chance, but the existence of a plausible link between cases reduces the credibility of this alternative explanation.

The plausible link is founded on the memory of food purchasing and consumption habits over 20-year period. Victims and controls in the study were not equivalent.

9% of butchers (UK) practiced brain removal during the 80’s (no information available for the early nineties when exposure probably peaked). Slaughtering practices were not precisely regulated or enforced until after the BSE epidemic among cattle had peaked.

Some commentators suggest that this study indicates a latency period of 10 years. Though this encourages the view that the total number of human victims will be relatively small, it is still far from certain.

Clusters of cases will provide some encouragement for those who wish to identify a probable source of contamination. Under normal circumstances such identification is usually very difficult.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

captcha *

Search Documents


Categories

  • Causation
    • de minimis
    • material contribution
  • Date of knowledge
  • Diagnosis
  • Duty of Care
  • Exposure estimation data
  • Mitigation
  • Motor related injury
  • News
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • November 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • November 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • November 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012

© Re: Liability (Oxford) Ltd. 2012. All rights reserved.
Website Design by The Big Picture