logo
Call us: +44 (0)1865 244727

  • Home
  • Scope
  • News
  • Products
    • RADAR
    • CALL-OFF PROJECTS
  • Clients
  • Contact
  • How we work
    • Independent
      • Common law orthodoxies
      • Sensationalism
      • Expert witness
      • Regulation and Politics
      • Tied services
    • Up-to-date
      • Timely
      • Insurance Scenarios
      • Probabilistic Methods
    • Expert
      • Personal Injury
      • Trends
    • Innovative
  • Database
    • Member’s login
    • Member’s Settings
    • Register
    • RADAR Database
  • Recent projects
    • EMFs
    • STRESS AT WORK
    • WHIPLASH
    • WELDING RODS: MANGANESE EXPOSURE
    • ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
    • Other Projects



2006: vCJD risk assessment.

Jul 03, 2012
by Andrew@Reliabilityoxford.co.uk
0 Comment
Evidence from:

The EFSA Journal. May (2006) 359 p 1 – 14.
“Quantitative assessment of the Human BSE Risk posed by Bovine Vertebral Column including Dorsal Root Ganglia”

If surveillance of cattle and meat processing continues at its present level and accuracy there is no justification for restrictions of the use of cattle bones in the production of tallow and gelatine.

Inclusion of vertebral column in the raw materials used to produce tallow and gelatine from bones or a mixture of tissues (meaning bone and nerve) increases the level of human exposure by ~ 3-10 fold. However, the levels of residual BSE risk for these products calculated in the Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) are low and the increased risk factor due to inclusion of vertebral column is unlikely to translate into further cases of vCJD in the population. Therefore, in the case of tallow and gelatine, there appears to be no rationale for imposing an age-limit above which to exclude vertebral column from the batches of raw materials used to produce these by-products.

Specified risk materials (other than vertebral columns) should continue to be excluded from the food
chain.

Comment
vCJD cases in the UK are compensated via a government sponsored scheme, the Board is not consulted on prevention issues such as these.

Relaxation of restrictions on animal processing should be accompanied by specific evaluation of management practices. It is possible that changes such as these could lead to unforeseen risks and risk related behaviours. Standards of meat hygiene in the UK are generally reported (in English language publications) to be higher than anywhere else.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

*
*

captcha *

Search Documents


Categories

  • Causation
    • de minimis
    • material contribution
  • Date of knowledge
  • Diagnosis
  • Duty of Care
  • Exposure estimation data
  • Mitigation
  • Motor related injury
  • News
  • Uncategorized

Archives

  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • November 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • November 2017
  • July 2017
  • April 2017
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • November 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • December 2014
  • October 2014
  • July 2014
  • April 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012

© Re: Liability (Oxford) Ltd. 2012. All rights reserved.
Website Design by The Big Picture